| | |  | Hacking | Home » » » Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? | | | | | | | Product Promotions: | | | | | Description: | | Many people find themselves dissatisfied with recent linguistic philosophy, and yet know that language has always mattered deeply to philosophy and must in some sense continue to do so. Ian Hacking considers here some dozen case studies in the history of philosophy to show the different ways in which language has been important, and the consequences for the development of the subject. There are chapters on, among others, Hobbes, Berkeley, Russell, Ayer, Wittgenstein, Chomsky, Feyerabend and Davidson. Dr Hacking ends by speculating about the directions in which philosophy and the study of language seem likely to go. The book will provide students with a stimulating, broad survey of problems in the theory of meaning and the development of philosophy, particularly in this century. The topics treated in the philosophy of language are among the central, current concerns of philosophers, and the historical framework makes it possible to introduce concretely and intelligibly all the main theoretical issues. | | | Product Details: | | | Author:
| Ian Hacking | | Paperback:
| 212 pages | | Publisher:
| Cambridge University Press | | Publication Date:
| September 26, 1975 | | Language:
| English | | ISBN:
| 0521099986 | | Product Length:
| 0.77 inches | | Product Width:
| 0.5 inches | | Product Height:
| 0.06 inches | | Product Weight:
| 0.5 pounds | | Package Length:
| 7.8 inches | | Package Width:
| 4.96 inches | | Package Height:
| 0.63 inches | | Package Weight:
| 0.57 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
| based on 1 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
( 1 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
12 of 12 found the following review helpful:
Not an Introductory BookOct 30, 2004
By Student As with all of Hacking's books, it is well written and researched. However, it is not nearly as simple to understand as some of his other writings. I have taken courses one course each in logic, philosophy of psychiatry, and linguistics, and have done a good deal of reading on my own. That did NOT suffice. There is much discussion of early modern philosophy. I would not recommend this book unless you have some background in Hobbes, Locke, Descartes, etc., as well as some knowledge of twentieth century contemporary analytic philosophy.
This book is just barely out of the reach of someone who is interested and an avid reader. Something along the lines of a minor in philosophy is needed.
| | |
|